<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Bill of Rights?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefourthplace.net/blog/2007/09/06/internet-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefourthplace.net/blog/2007/09/06/internet-bill-of-rights/</link>
	<description>a space to think</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://thefourthplace.net/blog/2007/09/06/internet-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefourthplace.net/blog/2007/09/06/internet-bill-of-rights/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t that allow for a state wide ban on privately useless activity whether or not it is publicly beneficial? Like, I dunno, checking facebook... 

Also, who decides what is privately beneficial and publicly detrimental?

Strong limits on the actions of Government coupled with a cheap and flexible system of justice (common law? torts?) accessible to any individual or group who has been harmed is enough. These seem like simple things to achieve, but I fear we have neither right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t that allow for a state wide ban on privately useless activity whether or not it is publicly beneficial? Like, I dunno, checking facebook&#8230; </p>
<p>Also, who decides what is privately beneficial and publicly detrimental?</p>
<p>Strong limits on the actions of Government coupled with a cheap and flexible system of justice (common law? torts?) accessible to any individual or group who has been harmed is enough. These seem like simple things to achieve, but I fear we have neither right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flotsam</title>
		<link>http://thefourthplace.net/blog/2007/09/06/internet-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Flotsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefourthplace.net/blog/2007/09/06/internet-bill-of-rights/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Or as Karl Auerbach put it: &quot;Every person shall be free to use the Internet in any way that is privately beneficial without being publicly detrimental&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or as Karl Auerbach put it: &#8220;Every person shall be free to use the Internet in any way that is privately beneficial without being publicly detrimental&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
